https://cloud.blender.org/p/gallery/5dd6d7044441651fa3decb56
i forgot to add the review of Pop! os
Pop!_OS
Pop!_OS, developed by System76, is known for its focus on providing a seamless experience for developers and creative professionals. The installation process was straightforward and user-friendly, with the system offering a clean and intuitive interface.
Rendering Performance
Blender ran smoothly on Pop!_OS, completing the render in 17 minutes and 58 seconds. While this was not the fastest time recorded, the system remained stable throughout the process, with no crashes or errors. The slightly longer rendering time could be attributed to the system's default configuration, which prioritizes a balance between performance and system resources.
Ease of Use
Pop!_OS excelled in ease of use, from installation to system updates and Blender configuration. Its built-in tools and optimizations for creative work made it an enjoyable environment to work in, even if it wasn't the quickest in rendering.
Popular Events
More
In the world of 3D design and modeling, Blender has solidified its position as one of the most versatile and powerful tools available. Its ability to perform complex and detailed renders has attracted both professionals and amateurs alike. However, Blender's performance can vary significantly depending on the operating system it runs on. Given that Blender is an application that heavily relies on system performance, the chosen operating system can impact both rendering speed and the overall stability of the software.
This article focuses on a comprehensive evaluation of Blender's performance across various popular operating systems. By conducting comparative tests, we aim to identify which of these operating systems offers the best balance between ease of use and performance for intensive rendering tasks. In an environment where hardware resources may be limited, it is crucial to find the operating system that maximizes efficiency and minimizes downtime.
To provide an objective evaluation, we have selected a range of operating systems that represent a wide variety of configurations and design philosophies. This includes Linux distributions known for their stability and flexibility, as well as options more oriented towards users and developers. The comparison of these operating systems is done using a standard Blender file, allowing for a consistent and replicable evaluation of performance.
Methodology
Test Environment Preparation To ensure a fair and accurate comparison between operating systems, a standardized testing methodology was employed. A computer with specific specifications was used for all tests:
Each operating system was installed cleanly on the same computer, followed by the application of all available updates. The system configuration was kept in its default state, without applying additional optimizations that could influence the software's performance.
Blender Installation and Configuration Blender was installed from the recommended source for each operating system. In Linux distributions, the software store or official repositories were used, while in Windows, the Microsoft Store was used. The following steps were then performed for each operating system:
Test Procedure For the evaluation of Blender's performance, a publicly available Blender file was used. The rendering process was carried out under controlled conditions to obtain consistent rendering times and compare the results between the different operating systems.
Results Analysis Once the tests were completed, the results were analyzed to identify the relative performance of each operating system. Rendering times were compared, and ease of use was evaluated based on the overall user experience and the problems encountered during the tests. This analysis provides a clear view of how each operating system handles Blender's demands and helps identify the best options for users with different needs and preferences.
1. Deepin OS
Deepin OS stands out for its sleek and user-friendly graphical interface. The installation was the fastest of all, completing in less than 10 minutes. Upon opening Blender and proceeding with the rendering, the system became sluggish, especially when moving the cursor, which is understandable given the intensive resource usage. The rendering was completed in 4 minutes and 37.10 seconds without any errors or crashes.
2. Fedora with GNOME
Fedora, known for its stability and cutting-edge technology, encountered several issues. The installation took over 30 minutes, and after a mandatory restart, Blender (installed via Flatpak) crashed when initiating the render. I attempted using the RPM package, but the problem persisted. This is a recurring issue mentioned in Fedora forums.
3. Manjaro with KDE
Manjaro, based on Arch Linux, is renowned for its ease of use and access to up-to-date software. The installation was quick and straightforward, but Blender encountered similar problems to Fedora. I tried installing Blender from various sources (Flatpak, binary, and git), but in all cases, the application crashed when attempting to render.
4. Linux Mint with Cinnamon
Linux Mint is known for its focus on ease of use. The installation was quick, and the system updated without issues. However, Blender crashed repeatedly at the end of the rendering process, preventing a verifiable rendering time. According to preliminary data, the estimated time was 7 minutes, though this could not be confirmed due to the crashes.
5. Nobara
Although the installation was relatively quick, the update process and issues with KDE affected the overall experience. Blender ran without problems, but the rendering time was significantly high at 4 hours and 22 seconds. The ease of use rating was 4 due to problems with the graphical interface.
(for some reason the deepin forum dint let me upload the full screenshot)
7. Ubuntu
Ubuntu is one of the most recognized Linux distributions. Although the installation was slow and presented some issues, Blender was installed from Snap. During rendering, the system became sluggish, and Blender crashed at the end, with an estimated time of 4 minutes and 10 seconds, though this could not be verified.
8. Windows 11
Finally, I tested Windows 11, which, despite its improvements in design and functionality, presented challenges during installation due to the need for additional modules to run Blender. The system became sluggish during rendering but completed the task in 16 minutes and 22.08 seconds.
Deepin OS stood out for its ease of use and acceptable rendering time, although the system became slow during the process. Pop!_OS offered solid performance and a very positive user experience. On the other hand, distributions like Fedora, Manjaro, and Linux Mint presented compatibility and stability issues with Blender, making it difficult to obtain consistent results.
Conclusions
The choice of the right operating system for working with Blender can have a significant impact on productivity and user experience. While there is no one-size-fits-all answer, the results of this research suggest that:
Factors to Consider:
In conclusion, choosing the right operating system for working with Blender is a personal decision that should be based on each user's individual needs and preferences. The results of this research can serve as a starting point for making an informed decision.
In particular, the excellent work done by the developers of Deepin OS deserves special mention. The distribution has managed to balance a modern and accessible interface with robust performance in intensive tasks such as rendering. The dedication and effort put into the development of Deepin 23 are evident, and the results speak for themselves.
Congratulations to the developers of Deepin 23 for their excellent work. Their commitment to quality and innovation is palpable and appreciated by the user community. Keep up the great work, as you are making a significant contribution to the free software ecosystem and the continuous improvement of the tools and experiences available to everyone.