Deepin-mail app
Tofloor
poster avatar
nico988
deepin
2017-12-08 15:34
Author
Is there any possibility that deepin developper's team have planned a new app (Deepin-Mail ?) to manage mails and calendar ? compatibility with MS exchange, pop, imap, gmail etc...)

if yes, when is it scheduled ? if not is that conceivable ?

Thanks for all your job. It's the better distros.

Reply Favorite View the author
All Replies
155******75
deepin
2017-12-08 17:25
#1
Good idea, look forward to an early realization!
Reply View the author
tmcdowell319
deepin
2017-12-09 06:09
#2
I hope this is something that will happen. I would love to see a Deepin-Mail type application!
Reply View the author
meda
deepin
2017-12-09 07:49
#3
Good idea but There are couple for example may I send any item ( mp3, jpeg, dokument, text ...) with right click send to... Can I use with Firefox, Chrome, Libreoffice ....  beside Deepin notifications are bad.
Reply View the author
RealAct
deepin
2017-12-10 07:17
#4
I would definitely love to see a Modern looking Deepin Mail Client as well.
Reply View the author
jlice
deepin
2017-12-10 20:05
#5
Thunder Bird is good enough, I think
Reply View the author
carrjay
deepin
2017-12-10 20:35
#6
https://bbs.deepin.org/post/149793
Thunder Bird is good enough, I think

Yes, I  agree
Reply View the author
luoan2086
deepin
2017-12-10 21:59
#7
You can search some other mail softwares in the store
Reply View the author
nipos
deepin
2017-12-11 01:12
#8
I don't like Thunderbird.
The user interface looks very old and ugly.
If they would make it look like the new Firefox,I would try it again.
For now,I'm happy with Geary.
It's a simple and small email client with GTK design what means that the design reminds me a bit of Deepins own applications.
An Deepin email client would be cool,I would change to it if one was available.
Reply View the author
Comments
nico988
2017-12-11 13:10
yes agree with that and the Deepin App have a style like deepin-os and Thunderbird doesn't have it !!
liberallt7
deepin
2017-12-11 02:17
#9
thunder bride,
Reply View the author
RealAct
deepin
2017-12-11 04:44
#10
https://bbs.deepin.org/post/149793
I don't like Thunderbird.
The user interface looks very old and ugly.
If they would make it look lik ...

I absolutely agree with you %100 Thunderbird is a very nice client but the interface looks so dated and ugly, it looks like a program taken straight out from the 90s.
Reply View the author
poorcabbage
deepin
2017-12-11 05:05
#11
MailSpring is the best mail client that ever saw on linux,you can try it
Reply View the author
RealAct
deepin
2017-12-11 09:29
#12
https://bbs.deepin.org/post/149793
MailSpring is the best mail client that ever saw on linux,you can try it

Yeah, that's what I have been using since I installed deepin over a month ago, I agree it's very good looking, but it feels heavy and if you use more than 4 e-mail accounts it keeps bugging you about upgrading to the pro version, I have also found it hard to get rid of some spam mail without opening it first which is bad because these e-mails contain tracking cookies etc that spammers use to send you even more spam, so yeah, still looking forward to a deepin built in mail client.
Reply View the author
nico988
deepin
2017-12-11 13:02
#13
https://bbs.deepin.org/post/149793
Thunder Bird is good enough, I think

Thunderbird, may be but it's not a deepin app with the same look and the same theme and the same philosophy and i don't know if there is a link with the deepin calendar.

What's good about deepin is that the developers are not stingy in their development and the results can be seen at every level in their distro and we don't know if thunderbird will be alive the next two years.

For me a deepin-mail app is missing to get a full homogeneous distro.
Reply View the author
nico988
deepin
2017-12-11 13:06
#14
Edited by nico988 at 2017-12-11 08:09
https://bbs.deepin.org/post/149793
MailSpring is the best mail client that ever saw on linux,you can try it

It's not a "deepin app" with same look and same theme and same philosophy and same integration with desktop.
Reply View the author